![]() Incidentally this is obviously not aimed specifically at mac users but I think that the principles are more universal in application. It doesn't matter how many backups you keep at home they are not proof against fire, flood, or burglary. The third copy is kept offsite or alternatively try cloud backup for that copy even though it does risk some of the above downsides. Then you find that your one backup drive is corrupt! Make two to try to avoid this using drives from two different manufacturers to minimise production batch errors. If you only make one backup then you have one shot at a restore. Your files are there somewhere but it now requires a specialist to retrieve them at some cost.įrankly IMO, although it requires more effort, it is more secure to just copy and paste your files to an external HDD or, better three of them. Fab Backup 3 is no more and there are no obtainable copies. Your new download is years later and they now have Fab Backup 7. Then you find that they're not there, they went out of business six months ago. Oh, you haven't got the backup app on your new computer. OK you think, I have a backup and will buy a replacement computer. Suddenly your computer has a catastrophic failure. ![]() You've been backing up for 5 years using an app. Add in a dose of reality and this is what will happen:ġ. Why? Because if you use an application to back up your files you also need to use it to restore them. I am generally averse to using any proprietary backup software. It will grow but not by any dramatic rate increase over the next few years. Do you feel a 2TB size is sufficient to back up a music library with a current size of 850GB. I've thought about getting two more 2TB SSD like my SSD now used for my Music Library to use as the backups. I have a reason to use external portable versus desktop units for backup and storage. Can you advise which software solution would be best and how to properly set it up? Additionally the HDD I use now are external portable 4TB units. I want both my MacBook and my Music Library which is on an external SSD to be backed up at the same time. I have used Carbon Copy Cloner in the past but I would consider myself very novice in understanding the set up and advantage of using one or the other. I'm unsure if it is the HDD or Time Machine causing this unusual (it seems to me) long back up time (several hours vs a few minutes). ![]() I am experiencing some slowdown in the time it takes to backup. Whether or not there is any reason to suspect WD drives themselves are any less reliable than others, using drives from different manufacturers also has its advantages.I have primarily used Time Machine on two external HDD as primary and secondary (weekly/monthly) backups. Separate drives will convey a greater measure of redundancy. A mechanical failure of the drive is likely to result in the simultaneous loss of both backups. Redundancy is certainly beneficial as backups are concerned, but partitioning a single drive for the purpose of using CCC for one volume and TM for another is less than ideal. I would hate to lose a years worth of backups when I connect the drive to the Mac. I want to start to use CCC and it would be as a partition on my Time Machine drive. Like most of what Apple designs DU presents a deceivingly simple user interface but underneath its appearance it is quite robust. Using non-Apple software to second-guess Apple's file system is never a good idea, if for no other reason than it complicates troubleshooting.Īpple's Disk Utility is all that is required. If you read all 30 pages of that sordid tale it's quite evident the Western Digital utilities were implicated, and in many cases the misery had been compounded with other, similar utilities. If that is in fact correct it would be reason to avoid WD altogether, but for what it's worth I maintain a variety of WD hard disks and use both Carbon Copy Cloner and Time Machine for backup purposes, and have not experienced a single problem with any of them. Nevertheless there are users who insisted that merely connecting a Western Digital hard disk to their Mac resulted in instantaneous and complete data loss. In many cases in which data loss has been reported, users were not aware that such utilities had been installed, but such things simply don't get installed by themselves. Other manufacturers such as Seagate have similar utilities but they are not needed either. ![]() Whether they fixed it since then is unknown but it's a moot point if you don't install their utilities to begin with. Western Digital acknowledged this problem. As far as anyone has been able to determine the problems are related to Western Digital's "SmartWare" and similar hard disk drive monitoring utilities, which should never be installed on a Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |